By admin 
For the first time in the 80-year history of Sacramento State, first-year students entering campus this fall are required to live on campus — unless they’re local to the area. Since the new policy was announced by President Luke Wood last August, it has ignited spirited debate within the school community on affordability, infrastructural capacity, shared governance and the essential character of the campus.
Read more In this California race, both Democrats and Republicans want to tout their money
But Sacramento State is not the first California State University campus to try out this policy. Eight others within the 22-campus system implemented residential requirements before Sacramento, two of which have since suspended the policy.
In 2019, San Jose State paused its rule requiring nonlocal freshmen to live on campus after eight years of overflowing waitlists, confusion within the student body, and the financial hardship it posed for some. Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, on the other hand, has so far seen a smooth rollout of its phased approach that began in 2020 with only a limited group of first-year students. The policy, which will expand to all first-year students for this first time this fall, has so far contributed to student success, retention and belonging, officials said.
The campuses that require first-year students to live on campus also include Cal Poly Humboldt, CSU Bakersfield, CSU San Marcos, Cal State Monterey Bay and San Diego State. Cal Poly Pomona, like San Jose State, has suspended its policy at present. The school does not explain why on its website and did not answer requests for information on the policy change.
For Sacramento State leaders, the experience of other CSU campuses serves as a blueprint for success.
“I think we’re going to be OK, and if we come against something, we will definitely lean into it and address it,” said Nadine Kelley, executive director for housing services. “It’s an unknown situation for us and we’re just walking into it. But we’ve seen our colleagues at other places be successful with it. We’re excited about that.”
The benefits for students, university
Sacramento State leaders say the new policy is a part of its plan to eliminate student homelessness, boost graduation rates and grades, and shed the school’s reputation as a commuter campus. Research, the school said, shows that students who live on campus for two years experience higher academic achievement, greater sense of belonging and stronger personal development outcomes.
A 2025 CSU systemwide housing report noted a “profound difference in persistence rates” between students who lived on campus and those who lived away. The report said its latest data showed that the school’s six-year graduation rate was 8.3% higher for second-year students who lived on campus compared with those who lived off campus. In addition, GPAs were higher and academic probation rates lower. The report said living on campus provided students with a greater sense of belonging at the university.
But to respond to student homelessness amid California’s housing crisis, the report said campuses need a two-pronged strategy: constructing affordable beds and providing housing support services. These services include rapid rehousing for long-term stability and emergency programs for short-term, urgent needs.
Housing affordability versus occupancy
In November, Sacramento State students organized a protest on campus against the upcoming housing requirement, according to reporting from the campus student newspaper The State Hornet. While the school claimed the policy was aimed at reducing student homelessness, protesters believed it would have a negative impact on the affordability of the Sacramento State experience for future students.
At San Jose State, this concern manifested as a real problem. The school began requiring nonlocal freshmen to live on campus in 2011 with the goal of meeting costs of housing facilities by increasing occupancy and improving student grades and graduation rates. By 2019, the school decided to suspend the rule.
According to Kevina Brown, a spokesperson for San Jose State’s housing department, there were several factors that led to this outcome. One of them was that students who could not afford on-campus housing were disincentivized from attending the institution altogether, she said. The Academic Senate became concerned about the requirement “ostracizing” students who could not afford it, Brown said.
“There were times when it looked great from the perspective of occupancy,” Brown said. “But in terms of servicing our students, it really was causing a lot of anxiety, confusion and one more hurdle for students to jump through.”
The school tried to ease that difficulty by providing exemption categories. Eventually, once San Jose State realized it no longer needed the requirement to fill its halls and bring in rent money, the school suspended it. If, at some point, student housing occupancy falls below a certain threshold, the campus may consider bringing back the requirement, Brown said.
At Sacramento State, one of the categories under which students can apply for an exemption from the new residential requirement is financial hardship. In addition, the school is offering a reduced rent program for 285 first-time freshmen beginning this year — a requisite of the state grant that enabled the construction of a new five-story residence hall set to open next month. Under this program, a limited number of students in double occupancy rooms will receive a 25% discount on rent during their first year on campus, bringing the cost down to a little over $1,000 per month.
For the 2026-2027 school year, the regular rate to rent a single room at Sacramento State — not including meals — is about $1,600 per month under a nine-month agreement that includes winter break. Sharing a room with one other student reduces that rent to about $1,400 and with two others makes it $1,120. A studio costs $1,850 per month. These are approximate figures; rents differ across different halls. These rates reflect about a 7% increase from the previous year.
Read more Sac State to roll out new on-campus living requirement. Does it have the space?
According to real estate aggregator Zillow, the average rent for a studio apartment in Sacramento is currently $1,366 per month – markedly lower than the campus price.
“It feels like the administration is a bit out of touch,” said Cameron Collier, a senior actively involved with a group called Students for Quality Education, which organized the November protest. “I was someone who had to move locally in order to go to school here. Of the options presented to me, the dorms were not the cheapest. If I were put into the position of enrolling and paying exorbitantly extra to live on campus, it would remove Sacramento State as an affordable option.”
Nearly 50% of the student body is eligible for federal Pell Grants — a need-based financial aid program. Collier said the campus community was vibrant and had students who came from all over the state because it offered a higher education opportunity with minimal debt. But now that could change, he said.
Kelley, who leads the campus housing division, said financial aid can cover students’ expenses outside of tuition and fees. It can include their housing expenses too, she said. However, students often choose not to accept all the aid available to them in order to reduce their debt burden.
How other CSU campuses did it
While students are worried about the big picture impact of the new policy, other CSU campuses with residential requirements say that successful implementation needs a focus on the details: clear rules, streamlined processes and robust communication.
According to Donyet King, housing executive director at Cal Poly Humboldt, the most critical part of putting in place a new residential requirement is “focusing on operational details.” This includes system setup, collaborating with the Information Technology team, communicating with students and ensuring a clear exemption process.
Cal Poly Humboldt is only a year ahead of Sacramento State in its implementation of a residential requirement. The immediate benefit, King said, was first-year students having the certainty that they would be accommodated within campus housing without having to compete for limited availability.
Cal Poly SLO, meanwhile, attributes its successful rollout to a multi-year planning process and slow phasing in of the requirement. In 2020, the school began requiring first-year athletes and students from two of the school’s colleges to live on campus. Gradually, they added more colleges. By fall 2025, nearly 40% of the school’s undergraduates lived on campus, including 98.5% of first-year students. Now, in 2026-2027, the program will be fully implemented for the first time with all first-year students living on campus for two years.
“The phasing allowed the university to establish processes and evaluate operational impacts before expanding the requirement to all incoming students,” spokesperson Keegan Koberl said. “Overall, implementation proceeded successfully. Housing demand from the impacted student groups aligned with projections and the phased approach allowed housing and campus partners to identify operational considerations and refine communication, assignments and support processes ahead of the broader implementation.”
To ensure smooth implementation, Koberl said the campus focused on expansion of housing capacity to accommodate increased demand, balancing housing spaces among first-year, transfer and continuing students, refining exemption policies to ensure equity, and communicating timelines and policy changes to students. The policy, he said, was expected to strengthen the residential experience and support student outcomes over time.
So far, Sacramento State officials say their rollout has been hiccup-free.
Is there enough space?
At San Jose State, the school could not house nearly 120 freshmen who were required by rule to live in the dorms in 2017, two years before the requirement was suspended. At CSU Monterey Bay, high housing demand forced the school to reduce its residential requirement rule to only freshmen in the 2025-2026 school year, after years of requiring both freshmen and sophomores to live on campus.
Sacramento State’s new 335-bed Mt. Whitney Hall, set to open next month, will absorb the boost in freshman housing demand this year. However, about 150 non-freshmen were on the housing waitlist as of June 1.
Next year, when the residential requirement expands to sophomores and the local exemption shrinks to only those who live within a 30-mile radius of campus, the school will unveil a 355-bed apartment complex called Hornet Place for upper-division students. This is intended to free up space in the residence halls for more freshmen and sophomores.
According to an October social media post, the campus has initiated a search for partners to provide even more affiliated campus housing like Hornet Place and Hornet Commons in the near future. To avoid the San Jose State and CSU Monterey Bay experience, further expansion is clearly in the cards.
Read more In this California race, both Democrats and Republicans want to tout their money