California relies on goats to combat fires. A wage change threatens the industry

Goats have become a familiar sight on California hillsides, munching through weeds and brush before they can become fuel for wildfires. But the companies that put those herds to work said a change in state labor rules have made goat grazing too expensive to continue.

Read more California Democrats back Ben Allen for insurance commissioner

The labor rule in question was a temporary state law that allowed goat herders to be paid under the same wage structure as sheep herders, but expired July 1. Goat grazing companies said the expiration meant they could face annual wage costs of about $240,000 per herder because of overtime requirements.

Company owners said the higher labor costs might force them to switch from goats to sheep, or shut down and sell their herds.

“As a business owner, we just really don’t know what the future is going to hold,” said Andrée Soares, a third-generation rancher who is president of Star Creek Land Stewards, a grazing company that employed five to 14 herders, depending on the season.

In California, grazing companies were frequently hired by cities and other local governments to use goats to reduce vegetation that could fuel wildfires. The exact percentage of California’s 500,000 sheep and 125,000 goats used for targeted grazing was unknown, but labor advocates and grazing company owners and increasing.

Tim Arrowsmith, owner of Western Grazers, a goat grazing company in Red Bluff, said goats could eat a much wider variety of plants than sheep, including starthistle, a thorny weed that grew densely and could become a wildfire risk because of its dry, fibrous stems and leaves. Sheep would eat starthistle only in the early stages of growth, but goats would eat it even after it became prickly.

“They eat a lot of other forms that sheep might pick at, but not really do a good job at cleaning up,” Arrowsmith said.

Without another change in state law, Arrowsmith said he would likely have to sell his goats by the end of the year. In that case, he said, many of the animals could be slaughtered.

“What are you going to do with 100,000 goats that hit the market?” Arrowsmith asked. “Of course they’re going to get slaughtered.”

Sheep herders exempt, goat herders aren’t

The law at the center of the dispute was Assembly Bill 1066, signed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown, which gradually extended overtime pay requirements to agricultural workers. Under the law, agricultural workers eventually became entitled to 1.5 times their normal wage for working more than eight hours a day or 40 hours a week.

Range herders, including sheep and goat herders, were originally treated differently under the overtime law because most herding companies said they could not afford conventional hourly overtime for jobs that required herders to remain on duty around the clock. Instead, the state established a minimum monthly wage for herders that included $2,934 in regular wages and an additional $1,887 in overtime wages.

More than 90% of sheep and goat herders in California worked under H-2A visas, most commonly coming from Peru and Mexico. Companies like Western Grazers also had to cover herders’ room and board, meals, limited clothing expenses and transportation to and from their home countries, along with visa costs.

“We even provide company vehicles because they need to be able to do their laundry and go grocery shopping,” Arrowsmith explained. At the time, sheep and goat herders made around $60,000 a year in wages, in addition to expenses paid by their employers, he said.

In 2022, the California Labor Commissioner’s Office determined that the alternative minimum monthly wage applied only to sheep herders, not goat herders. The interpretation meant goat herders were subject to standard overtime requirements for the hours they worked, potentially pushing annual wages to around $240,000 per herder, in addition to expenses paid by employers.

Grazing industry representatives protested the change.

“There is no cost of living for them,” Arrowsmith said. “And now you’re telling us you want to raise their wages to 200 and 20 or 30 thousand dollars a year?”

The backlash prompted state legislators to pass Senate Bill 143, which temporarily allowed goat herders to be paid the alternative minimum monthly wage used for sheep herders through June 30, 2026. The legislation also required a report on the employment of sheep and goat herders.

That provision expired June 30, leaving goat grazing companies once again subject to the higher wage requirements.

Why hire foreign workers?

Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, who authored AB 1066 while serving in the state Assembly, said she fought for the bill because she believed agricultural workers should have the right to an eight-hour workday like other workers.

“I am the child of somebody who came to this country as an (agricultural) worker,” Fletcher said. “This is about human respect and dignity, and the fact that we should treat all workers the same.”

Read more Sacramento Valley land sank during drought pumping, study says. Why it matters

Workers on H-2A visas were particularly vulnerable, said Fletcher, now president of the California Federation of Labor Unions. Herders working under the visa program could work for employers such as Western Grazers for three years, return to their home countries for 90 days and then return to California for another three years, she said. They often spoke little to no English, worked in isolation and had no direct path to U.S. citizenship through the visa program.

“The guest visa program is set up in a way that is exploitative to workers and doesn’t empower them,” she said.

Fletcher also said herders sometimes faced poor working conditions: “So many goat herders who are brought to this country are placed in isolation, way up in the hills and around nobody, in a trailer, sometimes without running water, and are expected to work 24/7, 365 days a year.”

The required by SB 143, however, found that from 2018 through 2024, only one labor law violation potentially involving herders was reported to the Labor Commissioner’s Office. As of November 2025, the office was conducting multiple herder-related investigations, one of which had been resolved after investigators concluded the employer was paying legally required wages.

Arrowsmith said grazing companies used H-2A workers because U.S. workers did not apply for herding jobs.

“Americans are a little spoiled in their work habits,” Arrowsmith explains. “The other part of it is, it’s hard work. It’s hot, it’s dirty.”

Employers seeking H-2A workers first had to advertise the jobs to U.S. workers. Arrowsmith said he had received applications from people around the world, including South Africa, Mexico, Russia and India.

“What I have not had are any American resumes or applications,” he said. Arrowsmith also said grazing companies were required to hire qualified U.S. applicants over H-2A workers. “(Domestic workers) have preference over foreign agricultural workers. They just don’t want the job.”

The report required by SB 143 and submitted to California’s Department of Industrial Relations concluded that sheep and goat herding involved similar work.

“All stakeholders agree that the alternative minimum monthly wage for range herders who are on duty 24/7 should be the same for sheep and goat herders because the workers and work involved in herding sheep and goats are similar and often overlap,” the report read.

“The Legislature got this study and did absolutely nothing with it,” said Soares. “They just let (SB 143) expire.”

What comes next

Soares, who sits on the board of directors of the California Wool Growers Association, said the association had hired a lobbyist to push for a change in state law when the Legislature reconvened in August. If the law remained unchanged, Soares said, there would be no market for goats in California.

If that happens, “all the goat producers in this state will be liquidating,” she said.

Although companies like Western Grazers and Star Creek Land Stewards said they faced the prospect of closing or changing their operations, at least one larger grazing company said it had a plan to adapt.

“Things obviously will change, but we have a plan in place, and we will accommodate the new law,” said Paul Abess, an operations manager at Capra Environmental Services, which employed 14 herders, mostly to tend goats.

Soares said the decision would be difficult: “It’s going to be a challenge whether I’ll sell all of my goats and convert to sheep. Depends on the economics at the time.”

Arrowsmith said Western Grazers was already feeling the financial pressure from the higher wages.

“We’re hoping there’s enough people calling Sacramento right now between now and August 15th or 20th, that there’s so much public outcry about this that the legislature will actually take it up and fix it,” he said. “We don’t know if they will.”

Read more What are the rules for driving with dogs in California? We asked the CHP

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *