By admin 
Sacramento officials faced another delay Tuesday to a financing deal intended to spur development in the Railyards District, an effort that faltered last summer amid a protest by a union and residents of two apartment complexes in the district.
Read more More details emerge from shooting of Mia Bieniemy, wife of Chiefs’ Eric Bieniemy
The deal would have the city repay developers’ costs for infrastructure work in the district — like the construction of roads, sidewalks and sewer and utility improvements — using expected increases in property taxes as the land is built out. Officials have described the agreement as a key step for development in the central portion of the former railyard, a large, complex, expensive piece of land adjacent to Sacramento’s downtown.
There is an existing special taxing district on 42 acres east of 7th Street, where Sacramento Republic FC plans to build a new, 20,000-seat soccer stadium. But officials have since tried to expand the district to encompass a 240-acre section of the Railyards, including the areas where developers plan to build a hospital, housing, retail and a concert venue. A city committee overseeing the financing agreement for developments in the district was expected to revive that effort Tuesday morning.
But as the meeting began, city staff announced the item would be withdrawn from the agenda and reintroduced at a later date.
The city attempted to pass the expansion last summer, and it appeared all but certain to succeed after a unanimous vote by the council with business groups, soccer fans and construction union members lending support.
But weeks later, as the subcommittee gathered to take a final vote cementing the deal, residents of the two apartment complexes — the 150-unit Wong Center and the 345-unit A.J. Apartments — surprised officials with 135 written protests, triggering a little-used piece of state law by which residents within such proposed taxing districts can mandate a one-year moratorium on the process, if a majority register their opposition.
The city determined that those protests indeed represented a majority of the residents in the largely undeveloped district.
Read more Carol Boisa identified as third victim in Alcatraz boat capsizing. Here’s what to know
The incident made Sacramento a test case for a relatively new bit of state statute, which established the protest process for this type of tax incentive.
A staff report posted ahead of Tuesday’s meeting showed a new map for the proposed special taxing district, with changed boundaries. One of the eastern margins cut further west, diverting around the Wong Center, and there was a box around The A.J. apartments marked “NPD,” or “Not Part of District.”
A handful of opponents of the special taxing district criticized the amended map at Tuesday’s meeting, referring to it as “microgerrymandering.”
Sonya Karabel, a spokesperson for Unite Here Local 49, the union opposing the agreement, said ahead of the meeting that the group was “exploring all of our pathways.”
“It’s really disappointing that they have taken away residents’ right to protest,” Karabel said. “We’re going to keep fighting.”
Read more Beshear says Senate could expel McConnell, urges him to give more health info or resign